The Facts Concerning Medi-Cal
Every
Medi-Cal applicant must apply for benefits and must meet
the asset and income limitations set by the State of
California. The rules for eligibility vary according to
the stage of the application process. For example, when an
application has been submitted, a couple’s total assets
are examined—both the community property assets and
their separate property assets. Once an individual has
qualified for Medi-Cal, ONLY the assets of the spouse in
the nursing home are examined. Therefore, if the healthy
spouse inherits money after the ill spouse has qualified
for Medi-Cal, he or she can keep all of it. If he or she
inherits money prior to qualifying for Medi-Cal, it will
be included in meeting the Medi-Cal asset limits as if it
belonged to the ill spouse (Exempt Assets are listed at
right).
In
order to qualify for Medi-Cal, each applicant must be at
least 65 years of age or disabled, meet asset and
income requirements, and be a citizen or permanent
California resident. An applicant can also meet these
requirements if he or she is blind or disabled, and
payment of medical bills would leave him or her with less
than the available “need standard.”
This
means that if a single person ever needs LTC, as a result
of dementia, Alzheimer’s, stroke, crippling arthritis,
etc., the State of California will pay for meals, nursing
home bills, and medical care. But a single person can only
retain $2,000 in assets, plus the exempt assets listed
above—and then retain these assets ONLY for a limited
period of time. Medi-Cal will NOT let you keep your home
and other assets after you die free of liens.
|
|
|
|
|
EXEMPT
ASSETS
- Under the Medi-Cal law, these assets are ONLY exempt at the time
you enter the nursing home, and are NOT exempt for purposes of
inheritance by your children. Under Medi-Cal law, liens can be
imposed on both real property and personal property:
|
 |
The
home, houseboat, mobile home, multi-unit dwelling if he or
she lives in one of the units at the time he or she enters
the nursing home. The exemption is only for a limited
period of time and property is not exempt in terms of
inheritance. |
|
 |
Other
real property if and only if it is used as a business or a
means of self-support. Again it is NOT exempt forever. |
|
 |
Household
goods and personal effects |
|
 |
Wedding
and engagement rings of any value. Other jewelry up to a
$100 limit |
|
 |
One
automobile if used for the benefit of the applicant |
|
 |
Whole
life insurance with a face value of $1,500 |
|
 |
Term
life insurance of any face value |
|
 |
IRAs/Retirement
Plans in the name of the well spouse |
|
 |
Burial
Plots |
|
 |
Prepaid
Burial Plan - any amount and $1,500 in the bank where that
amount is designated for burial funds. This $1,500 must be
kept separate from other monies. |
|
 |
Cash
surrender value of pension funds and annuities in the name
of the ill spouse regardless of value if and only if
payments of principal and interest
are
being made. If the annuity was recently purchased AND the
payments were NOT amortized over the life expectancy of
the annuitant, then the annuity will NOT be exempt |
|
 |
$2000
in assets, called a “property reserve” for a single
person |
|
Asset
and Income Requirements for Couples
The exempt assets are the same as previously stated for a single
person, however, the healthy spouse who is living at home
is allowed to keep the following:
|
|
 |
$84,120
(for the year 2000) in assets instead of the $2,000
that a single person is allowed to keep. This is
called the CSRA. |
|
 |
The
greater of $2,103 (for the year 2000) per month in income
or all of the income in the “well spouse’s name.”
This is called the Minimum Monthly Maintenance Need
Allowance (MMMNA) and also referred to as the “name on
the check” rule. It means that if the healthy spouse is
working and receiving $5,000 in income, he or she can keep
the $5,000, still qualify his or her spouse for Medi-Cal,
and all of his or her nursing home and medical bills will
be paid for by the State of California. |
|
|
|
|
| Example: |
| A
wife is working earning $3,000 per month, her husband is
ill, and he is receiving $500 per month in Social
Security. The wife can keep all of her $3,000, but the
husband’s share of costs will be $500 per month, which
the nursing home will receive. |
|
Transferring
Assets Prior to Medi-Cal Qualification
|
Under
the old law, any transfer of resources made by a Medi-Cal
applicant or his spouse during the 30-month period preceding
application for Medi-Cal, to the extent it was a gift, resulted in
a period of ineligibility from Medi-Cal equaling 30 months. This
was called the “lookback period.” Therefore, you could
literally give away 1 million dollars under the old law and apply
for Medi-Cal in the 31st month after you gave it away. This is no
longer the case.
Under the new law, the “lookback period” is potentially
unlimited. It is equal to the value of the assets gifted divided
by the average |
|
cost
of a nursing home in the state of California per month, which is
approximately between $3,200 and $3,500 per month, depending upon
the year of calculation. Therefore, if you give away $100,000,
this will result in a period of disqualification from Medi-Cal of
approximately 34 months.
After
you meet income and resource requirements, and if a doctor or
health care provider certifies that your stay is “medically
necessary,” your room, board, and medical bills will be paid for
by the State of California. |
|
Return to Top

|
Liens and
Estate Recovery Claims
|
OBRA
1993 requires estate recovery programs in all 50 states for
medical assistance received and allows recovery against both the
real and personal property of any person who received nursing home
services. This new law will NOT apply to benefits paid before
October 1, 1993 and will NOT apply to assets disposed of on or
before 8-10-93 or to individuals who died on or before 8-10-93. |
|
Under
the former law, a lien could only be placed on probate assets.
Under OBRA 1993, a lien can be placed on both probate and
non-probate assets such as joint tenancies and life estates.
Nursing home advocacy agencies, such as California Advocates for
Nursing Home Reform, are attempting to change this law. |
Liens
Against the Home
A lien can be imposed on the home of an institutionalized individual if it
is determined that the nursing home resident cannot reasonably be expected
to return home. Federal law allows these liens to be imposed and there is
a rebuttable presumption that the institutionalized spouse cannot
reasonably be expected to return home if any of the following conditions
are met:
|
 |
The
beneficiary has been institutionalized for six months or
longer with no discharge plan in place |
|
 |
The
nursing home resident has received 30-days written notice
and an opportunity to be heard on the lien issue |
|
 |
The
nursing home resident has not stated that he or she
“intends to return home” in a legally enforceable
document |
|
|
| A
lien cannot be imposed if: |
|
 |
A
minor, blind, or disabled child is living in the home.
Under the recent case of DeMille v. Belshe, a lien
can be imposed when there is a spouse still living in the
home, if there has been a hearing on the lien issue, and
notice has been given. |
|
 |
The
nursing home resident’s sibling, who has an equity
interest in the home, has resided there at least
one year before the individual’s admission to a nursing
home. |
|
 |
Any
individual, other than the spouse, is living in the home
at leas two years before the resident was admitted to the
nursing home and who provided care that enabled the
resident to remain at home. |
|
Available
Planning Strategies
|
Non-Crisis
Planning
Amend your Revocable Living Trust to include Medi-Cal
Planning provisions. This will give the person you select the
power to accomplish the Medi-Cal planning to preserve your assets should
you ever need nursing home care. Without specific Medi-Cal
planning provisions, no one would be able to protect your assets
from the Medi-Cal spend-down
law.
If you are NOT in a crisis situation, then a Medi-Cal Protective
Trust can work well to protect the home. This trust must be
established at a time when the home has an “exempt” status.
After funding the home into a protective trust, the home will be
exempt from all future Medi-Cal liens and claims.
Additionally, the purchase of a long-term care insurance policy
for at least a 36-month period of time, would allow you to
establish a Medi-Cal Trust and “wait” the 36 months while your
nursing home care is being paid for by LTC insurance. |
|
|
|
Crisis
Planning
If you are in a crisis situation, but the ill person is still
mentally competent, then a Medi-Cal Protective Trust can still be
established to protect the home. Again, this trust must be
established at a time when the home has an “exempt” status.
Again, after funding the home into such a trust, the home will be
exempt from all future Medi-Cal liens and claims.
If you are in crisis and need to qualify for Medi-Cal immediately
or in the near future, your planning must be done with an attorney
who is familiar with this area of the law. What remedy is
available depends upon your family situation, and the nature of
your assets. One myth must be dispelled. Even in crisis planning,
the home and most of your other assets can be protected from Medi-Cal
liens, and preserved for your child or children to inherit.
Whether Court action is necessary to preserve your assets and
prevent any Medi-Cal liens depends upon the facts of the
particular case. Nevertheless, the sooner you plan ahead, the less
costly the Medi-Cal plan will be.
If the person in need is mentally incompetent, then all of the
Medi-Cal planning will have to be accomplished through a court
proceeding called a conservatorship.
Still, the home and many assets can be protected.
Because
it is not possible to set forth all of the many different types of
examples that we see in our office, let it suffice to say that
there are many, many ways to plan for Medi-Cal protection, but
each case is unique. |
Several
Medi-Cal Planning Strategies
|
 |
Administrative
Fair Hearings and/or Court Hearings to increase the resource
allowance (CSRA) beyond the $84,120 allowed by Medi-Cal |
|
Although
the list at left is NOT exhaustive, these strategies may be used
alone or in combination with one another.
Medi-Cal planning is separate and apart from Revocable Living
Trust Planning. A Revocable Living Trust escapes probate and
capital gains taxes, but does NOT protect against Medi-Cal liens.
(see Revocable Living Trust) |
|
 |
Court
Hearings to increase the monthly income allowance beyond the
$2,103 per month |
|
 |
Lifecare
contracts where a child or other individual is committed to caring
for the parent in the home |
|
 |
Sales
with self-canceling installment notes |
|
 |
Motion
for Substituted Judgment |
|
 |
Transferring
non-exempt assets into exempt assets |
|
 |
Long-Term
Care Insurance |
|
 |
Medi-Cal
Protective Trust |
|
 |
Sale
with leaseback provisions |
|
 |
Supplemental
Needs Trust set forth in a Will |
|
 |
Medi-Cal
Annuity |
What
You Should Know About Changes to the 7/1/00 Law
The law, which went into effect on 7–1–00, is called “Health Care
Decisions” and expanded
the law in several areas that include the
following:
|
|
|
OPPORTUNITIES
AVAILABLE
TO HELP SENIORS PLAN FOR NURSING HOME CARE
By Patricia Jo
Wilkinson, Esq.
Claremont, California
|
|
|
|

|
|
Most
senior citizens in our community are unaware of opportunities
available to them in the event they ever need skilled nursing
home care. Since care in a skilled nursing home facility costs
approximately $3,500 per month, it is important to know what
opportunities are available to help decrease this cost of care.
There are many planning opportunities available for married
couples who, living on Social Security and interest income, do
not realize the numerous planning opportunities available to
them. The State of California, through the Medi-Cal program,
will pay the cost of skilled care for one spouse while the other
spouse lives at home.
However, the general rule is that Medi-Cal will only pay the
cost of skilled nursing care if the healthy spouse who lives at
home (hereafter referred to as the “at-home” spouse) meets
asset and income requirements.
Medi-Cal divides assets into two categories: exempt and
non-exempt. Exempt assets are not counted in reaching the
maximum asset level. Exempt assets include the home (of any
value), IRAs in the name of the “at home" spouse, real
property “essential for self support,” property used in a
trade or business, household items used to furnish a home, all
personal effects, burial insurance, plots, trusts, vaults and
crypts, all term life insurance or any life insurance policy
with a face value of $1,500 or less, musical instruments,
automobiles, reparation payments, and crime victim payments.
Non-exempt assets such as cash, stocks, bonds, mutual funds,
money market accounts, etc., are counted in reaching the asset
limit.
The general rule is that the maximum non-exempt assets the “at
home” spouse can retain is $87,000 for the year 2001 plus all
of the exempt assets stated above, such as the home and IRAs.
However, this general rule is only a general rule and it
is not iron clad. This asset level is routinely increased from
$87,000 up to $350,000 if the “at home” spouse can
demonstrate that he or she needs this money to live on. One way
the “at home" spouse might demonstrate need is
illustrated in the following example.
Suppose a
husband’s monthly income is $1,260 per month from Social
Security and $400 per month from retirement benefits. The
wife’s monthly income consists of $600 per month in Social
Security. Suppose this couple has $300,000 in non-exempt assets
(CDs, cash, money market, etc.) and the wife would like to
qualify her husband for Medi-Cal benefits so that she is not
forced to pay $3,500 per month in nursing home costs. The wife
is afraid that if she is obligated to pay the nursing home
$3,500 per month for her husband’s care, and also pay her own
household bills, it will not be long before she has no money at
all.
|
|
|
|
The
federal government anticipated this problem when it passed the Medicare
Catastrophic Coverage Act (MCCA) in 1988.
Under MCCA, the wife can file a court petition seeking to
increase her asset level from $87,000 to $300,000 on the basis
that her monthly Social Security Income (excluding her
husband’s monthly income) is only $600 and she prefers to
retain her assets of $300,000, which, when invested at 5.5% (or
the current CD rate) would help bring up her monthly income to
the $2,175 maximum level. In this situation, the wife prefers to
keep all of the couple’s assets of $300,000, all of her own
social security, and a portion of her husband’s social
security up to a maximum monthly income of $2,175 and pay only
that portion of her husband’s Social Security and retirement
income which exceeds the $2,175 per month limit to the nursing
home. These petitions are routinely granted by the courts.
Similarly, for individuals who have a large retirement income
but assets at or below the $87,000 maximum, a court petition can
be filed seeking to increase the income level from $2,175 per
month to $4,000 per month. Again, there must be a demonstration
that the excess income over and above the $2,175 maximum limit
is needed to build up their asset level toward the $87,000 limit
or that the “at home” spouse otherwise needs this income for
home repairs, medical bills, etc.
As the population ages, it is important to remember that all
401(k)s and IRAs in
the “at home” spouse’s name are totally exempt from
counting toward the $87,000 limit just as the family home is
exempt from counting toward the $87,000 limit The ill spouse's
401(k) and IRA is “unavailable” and not counted initially,
but exempting this asset totally is possible but somewhat
complex.
Although planning for nursing home care for single individuals
was not discussed in this article, it certainly exists for those
seniors who are in need of skilled nursing care. However,
planning for a single person has a whole different set of asset
and income limits from those of a married couple, and contains a
different set of problems and solutions. Two categories of
assets, exempt and non-exempt exist and planning for single
persons who need skilled nursing care is just as important as
the planning for spouses.
In conclusion, our senior population needs to be aware that
planning for future nursing home care is extremely important if
seniors wish to preserve their assets and income in accordance
with the limits allowed by law. A certified Elderlaw Attorney is
the type of attorney who can explain and implement the planning
discussed in this article.
|
Patricia
Jo Wilkinson is an attorney with Wilkinson
and Wilkinson, practicing law in Claremont. |
|
|
|

|
|
Return to Top
|